| Case Number: | 3PA-03-00084SC |
| Case Type: | Small Claims (3PA) |
| Case Status: | Closed |
| Action: | Small Claim $2,500 or less |
| Case Judge: | Clerk, Palmer Court |
| File Date: | 25 Feb 2003 |
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| HUSKY ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. | Plaintiff |
| Thebodeau, Alan S | Defendant |
| VALLEY COLLECTIONS, INC. | Assignee |
| Disposition | Date | Case Judge |
|---|---|---|
| Default Judgment for Plaintiff by Clerk | 2003-04-25 | Clerk, Palmer Court |
| Receipt Number | Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 7927 | 2003-02-25 | $25.00 |
| Cost Type | Amount Owned | Amount Paid | Amount Adjusted | Amount Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | $25.00 | $25.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Filing Fee | $25.00 | $25.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Date | Text |
|---|---|
| Feb 25 2003 |
SC Less Than $2500 with 1 Defendant Receipt: 7927 Date: 02/25/2003 |
| Feb 26 2003 |
Issue Date: 02/26/2003
Service : Civil Summons
Method : Process Server
Cost Per :$
Thebodeau, Alan S
Tracking No: S000000288
|
| Feb 26 2003 |
Summons |
| Mar 21 2003 |
Successful Service
Method : Process Server
Issued : 02/26/2003
Service : Civil Summons
Served : 03/02/2003
Return : 03/18/2003
On : Thebodeau, Alan S
Signed By : Allan Thebodeau
Reason : Successful
Comment :
Tracking # : S000000288
|
| Mar 24 2003 |
Default Affidavit and Request for Judgment |
| Apr 25 2003 |
Judgment Docket Entry (001)
Judgment For Plaintiff by Default
Damages : $1,675.42 Interest : $76.60
Attorney Fees : $0.00 Costs : $70.00
Other Fees : $0.00
Total : $1,822.02
|
| Jun 19 2003 |
Writ of Execution & Notice of Levy on PFD (certified mail) Issued. |
| Feb 19 2004 |
Writ of Execution & Notice of Levy on PFD (certified mail) Issued.
Randall W. Westbrook (Attorney) on behalf of Valley Collections, Inc. (Assignee)
|
| Jan 11 2005 |
Information for Writ of Execution
Randall W. Westbrook (Attorney) on behalf of Valley Collections, Inc. (Assignee)
|
| Jan 12 2005 |
Writ of Execution & Notice of Levy on PFD (certified mail) Issued.
Alan S Thebodeau (Defendant)
|
| Jul 13 2005 |
For PFD Year 2003: PFD Div. Reports No Pay Against Debtor
This means the claim could not be satisfied. The PFD regulations on confidentiality prevent the PFD Division from explaining exactly why the claim was not satisfied. The reason may be:
1) The applicant was not eligible for a dividend, or
2) The dividend was attached by a claim with a higher priority.
See AS 43.23.065(c) and (b) for the priority of different types of claims.
THEBODEAU, ALAN S
|
| Aug 29 2005 |
Satisfaction of Judgment |
| Sep 14 2005 |
Notice of Termination of Writ of Execution / The underlying judgment is satisfied in full. |
