Search icon

3AN-98-05282CI PIONEER DOOR vs. Collins, Richard et al NKF

Court Case Details

Case Number: 3AN-98-05282CI
Case Type: Eviction District Court (3AN)
Case Status: Closed
Action: Eviction - District Court (may include rent and damages)
Case Judge: Finn, Natalie K
File Date: 10 Apr 1998

Parties

Name Role
PIONEER DOOR, INC. Plaintiff
Collins, Richard Defendant
Golden Years LLC Defendant

Dispositions

Disposition Date Case Judge
*Summary Judgment Prior to Conversion 2000-02-17 Finn, Natalie K

Docket

Date Text
Apr 10 1998
Filed Date: Apr 10 1998
Apr 10 1998
All Records Prior to 10/20/03 are Converted Records, for more information
            please come to the Clerks Office with the case number 
            or mail inquiries to:
            Anchorage Trial Courts
            Records Division
            825 West 4th Avenue
            Anchorage, AK 99501-2004.
            Please note that some converted data, especially dates, may be incorrect due to data entry errors prior to conversion.
Jun 14 1999
Motion for Summary Judgment
            Filed by:  PLTF
            C1:
            C2:  MOTION FOR EXT OF TIME UNTIL 7/19/99 TO FILE OPP
            C3:  NO OPP FILED
            C4:  GRANTED
            C5:
            C6:
            C7:
            C8:
Jul 02 1999
Motion for Extension of Time
            Filed by:  DEFT RICHARD COLLINS
            C1:  EXT OF TIME UNTIL 7/19/99 TO FILE DEFT'S OPP TO PLTF'S MOTION FOR S.J.
            C2:  NO OPP FILED
            C3:  MOOT/
            C4:
            C5:
            C6:
            C7:
            C8:
Jul 02 1999
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
            Filed by:  DEFT RICHARD COLLINS
            C1:  WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY FOR CAUSE
            C2:  NO OPP FILED
            C3:  SET FOR HEARING 8-5-99 AT 8:30 AM
            C4:  GRANTED ON RECORD 8/5/99
            C5:
            C6:
            C7:
            C8:
Jan 18 2000
Proposed Order (Linked to Motion)
            Filed by:  PLTF
            C1:  JUDGMENT SUBMITTED PER COURT'S ORDER ENTERED ON 8/13/99
            C2:  PREJUDGMENT COMPUTATION SHEET
            C3:  AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING FILED 1/25/00
            C4:  NO OBJECTIONS FILED AS TO FORM
            C5:  JUDGMENT FOR $50,000 AGAINST DEFENDANT
            C6:
            C7:
            C8:
Feb 17 2000
Closed Date: Feb 17 2000
Feb 17 2000
Non-Trial Judgment Amount
            Amt:50000.00
Aug 08 2000
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
            Filed by:  PLTF
            C1:  SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS
            C2:  AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED 8/24/00
            C3:  NO OPP FILED
            C4:  GRANTED BY CLERK-MARY PER 3AN-AO-00-06
            C5:
            C6:
            C7:
            C8:
Oct 19 2003
** CONVERTED PAYMENT HISTORY AS OF 10/19/03
            -------------------------------------------------------
            Receipt Date : 04/10/98	Receipt Number : 354877	Amount : $60        
            Party from : HOGE, .,
            
            	Tender : CK        
            	Tender : 3AN
            	Orig. Court : 3AN
            	Acct1 : 405
            	Total : 60
            	Comments : FED V COLLINS              
            	33date : 04101998
            	34time : 1622
            	35posted : P
            Receipt Date : 10/27/99	Receipt Number : 429003	Amount : $5         
            Party from : JONES, COLVER,
            
            	Tender : CK        
            	Tender : 3AN
            	Orig. Court : 3AN
            	Acct1 : 404
            	Total : 5
            	Comments : COPIES                     
            	33date : 10271999
            	34time : 0941
            	35posted : P
Dec 07 2004
Return of Service on PFD
            Attorney's Process Service $0.00
Apr 28 2005
Full Return of Service on Writ of Execution Filed
            Attorney's Process Service
Jul 08 2005
For PFD Year 2003: PFD Div. Reports No Pay  Against Debtor
            This means the claim could not be satisfied.  The PFD regulations on confidentiality prevent the PFD Division from explaining exactly why the claim was not satisfied.  The reason may be:
            1) The applicant was not eligible for a dividend, or
            2) The dividend was attached by a claim with a higher priority.  
            See AS 43.23.065(c) and (b) for the priority of different types of claims.
            COLLINS, RICHARD D