| Case Number: | 3AN-02-07394CI |
| Case Type: | Eviction District Court (3AN) |
| Case Status: | Closed |
| Action: | Eviction - District Court (may include rent and damages) |
| Case Judge: | Clerk, Anchorage Court |
| File Date: | 16 May 2002 |
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| CREEKSIDE MANOR, LLC | Plaintiff |
| Williams, Kathy | Defendant |
| Disposition | Date | Case Judge |
|---|---|---|
| *Default Judgment Prior to Conversion | 2002-07-26 | Clerk, Anchorage Court |
| Date | Text |
|---|---|
| 2002-05-16 |
Filed Date: May 16 2002
|
| 2002-05-16 |
All Records Prior to 10/20/03 are Converted Records, for more information
please come to the Clerks Office with the case number
or mail inquiries to:
Anchorage Trial Courts
Records Division
825 West 4th Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99501-2004.
Please note that some converted data, especially dates, may be incorrect due to data entry errors prior to conversion.
|
| 2002-05-16 |
Case flagged for Civil Rule 4(j) tracking (3AN)
Filed by: PLT
C1: RETURN OF SERVICE FILED 5/22/02
C2:
C3:
C4:
C5:
C6:
C7:
C8:
|
| 2002-07-26 |
Closed Date: Jul 26 2002
|
| 2002-07-26 |
Non-Trial Judgment Amount
Amt:1641.97
|
| 2003-10-19 |
** CONVERTED PAYMENT HISTORY AS OF 10/19/03
-------------------------------------------------------
Receipt Date : 05/16/02 Receipt Number : 547287 Amount : $60
Party from : ALASKA LAW, OFFICES,
Tender : CK
Tender : 3AN
Orig. Court : 3AN
Acct1 : 405
Total : 60
Comments : 5/16/02 #1231
33date : 05162002
34time : 1018
35posted : P
|
| 2005-07-08 |
For PFD Year 2003: PFD Div. Reports No Pay Against Debtor
This means the claim could not be satisfied. The PFD regulations on confidentiality prevent the PFD Division from explaining exactly why the claim was not satisfied. The reason may be:
1) The applicant was not eligible for a dividend, or
2) The dividend was attached by a claim with a higher priority.
See AS 43.23.065(c) and (b) for the priority of different types of claims.
WILLIAMS, JOE W
|
| 2005-08-08 |
For PFD Year 2003: PFD Div. Reports No Pay Against Debtor
This means the claim could not be satisfied. The PFD regulations on confidentiality prevent the PFD Division from explaining exactly why the claim was not satisfied. The reason may be:
1) The applicant was not eligible for a dividend, or
2) The dividend was attached by a claim with a higher priority.
See AS 43.23.065(c) and (b) for the priority of different types of claims.
WILLIAMS, JOE W
|
| 2021-03-30 |
Return of Service on PFD - No Money Seized
Alaska Court Services - Cost $0.00
Kathy Williams (Defendant);
|
